Scroll Up Top
Download icon
Download

Today, the case for investing in direct lending is not only strong on a structural basis but especially timely, reinforced by interest rate dynamics, recovering deal activity, M&A demand, and the potential risk of a pick-up in public market volatility. Taken together, we believe these forces present a potentially compelling moment for capital allocation to direct lending.

Direct lending, the direct, illiquid loans made to middle market companies, is the largest strategy within private credit. It has experienced impressive growth in recent years and now represents about $1 trillion in gross value.1 For investors seeking yield, diversification and downside protection, direct lending offers a potentially compelling opportunity in an uncertain backdrop. For these reasons, direct lending has become a core strategy within a fully diversified portfolio that combines private and public investments.

An improving supply-demand environment
A more deal-friendly environment is emerging as private equity managers, who previously slowed their deployment of “dry powder” due to higher interest rates and an inability to make returns work for their investors, are now poised to capitalize on a robust M&A recovery driven by renewed Fed rate cuts and improved tariff clarity. This environment is reinforced by a significant refinancing wave, with $475 billion2 in middle-market loans coming due in the next seven years, creating substantial demand for private equity and direct lending. As these factors gradually unfold over the next 24 months, direct lenders may experience improved pricing power and the potential for excess returns.

Resilience across a "higher-for-longer" rate environment
Across various economic cycles, direct lending has consistently demonstrated an ability to generate attractive returns. Direct lending’s resilience in different economic environments is due, in large part, to its floating-rate structure which offers protection against interest rate movements and inflation. Even in moderately declining rate environments, private credit strategies have delivered attractive returns, and over the last decade, they have delivered the highest returns per unit of volatility of all private asset classes, outpacing real estate, infrastructure, venture capital and private equity.3

An improving credit outlook
Lower interest rates could benefit a direct lending borrower’s credit profile by reducing floating-rate interest expenses, all else equal. While macro uncertainty remains on the horizon, recent evidence suggests that direct lending default rates, including restructurings,  have declined modestly falling below 4% for the first time in two years.4 In addition, the credit quality of middle-market companies has been stable, as evidenced by rising EBITDA to interest coverage ratios.

For a deeper exploration of these findings, please read the full-length insight:


Source: PitchBook. As of March 31, 2024.
2 Source: LSEG, PitchBook LCD, Morgan Stanley Investment Management. As of June 30, 2025. U.S. only.
Source: PitchBook, Morgan Stanley Investment Management. For the ten years ending March 31, 2025.
4 Source: PitchBook LCD, S&P Global. As of June 30, 2025. U.S. only. Direct lending default rate is based on S&P’s universe of middle-market companies receiving “credit estimates” and includes distressed exchanges as a default event. 

North America Private Credit

Morgan Stanley North America Private Credit invests in first and second lien debt; unitranche loans; mezzanine debt; and equity co-investments alongside controlling shareholders to support middle-market companies based in North America and Western Europe. The team seeks to create value as a long-term partner for owner-operated and private equity-backed businesses.

Definitions:

(EBITDA) Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization is essentially net income with interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization added back to it, and can be used to analyze and compare profitability between companies and industries because it eliminates the effects of financing and accounting decisions.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION:

The views and opinions are those of the author as of the date of publication and are subject to change at any time due to market or economic conditions and may not necessarily come to pass. The views expressed do not reflect the opinions of all investment personnel at Morgan Stanley Investment Management (MSIM) and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively the Firm”), and may not be reflected in all the strategies and products that the Firm offers.

This material is for the benefit of persons whom the Firm reasonably believes it is permitted to communicate to and should not be forwarded to any other person without the consent of the Firm. It is not addressed to any other person and may not be used by them for any purpose whatsoever. It is the responsibility of every person reading this material to fully observe the laws of any relevant country, including obtaining any governmental or other consent which may be required or observing any other formality which needs to be observed in that country.

This material is a general communication, which is not impartial, is for informational and educational purposes only, not a recommendation to purchase or sell specific securities, or to adopt any particular investment strategy. Information does not address financial objectives, situation or specific needs of individual investors.

Any charts and graphs provided are for illustrative purposes only. Any performance quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investments involve risks, including the possible loss of principal.

For the complete content and important disclosures, refer to the full article.